Drawing for MISTIFYING

USPTO serial 76554939

MISTIFYING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAN, DAWN L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MISTIFYING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donna J. Bunton

DONNA J BUNTON NIXON & VANDERHYE PC11TH FL901 N GLEBE RDARLINGTON, VA 22203

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011EVAPORATIVE COOLING AND MISTING SYSTEMS COMPRISED PRIMARILY OF PUMPS, NOZZLES, FITTINGS, TUBING, FILTERS, FLUSH MOUNTS AND HOUSINGS, AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR, NAMELY, MISTING RINGS, DRAIN VALVES, SOLENOID VALVES,BALL VALVES, TUBING CUTTERS, RELIEF VALVES, COUNTER BORE AND PILOT BIT, TAP AND DRILL AND REMOTE CONTRACTOR FOR REMOTE OPERATION OF PUMPS; AND PREPACKAGED COOLING KITS FOR RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL USE PRIMARILY COMPRISING PUMPS, NOZZLES, FITTINGS, FILTERS, TUBING, TUBING CUTTERS, NOZZLE CLEANING SOLUTIONS, PUMP OIL, VALVES AND INSTALLATION MANUALS SOLD AS A UNITACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 20, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 20, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 25, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 20, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 20, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 20, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 20, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 20, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 20, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 20, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 30, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 13, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 13, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 3, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 25, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 9, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 9, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 7, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 29, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance