USPTO serial 76555048
CONFERENCE AMERICA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HICKEY,TONI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CONFERENCE AMERICA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THEODORE A. BREINER
THEODORE A BREINER BREINER & BREINER, L.L.C.PO BOX 19290ALEXANDRIA, VA 22320-0290UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | promoting the use of telecommunications services through the administration of an incentive award program; managing a secure telecommunications network for others | ACTIVE | Jun 8, 1992 |
| 038 | telecommunications services, namely audio, video and data teleconferencing; streaming of audio and video material on the Internet | ACTIVE | Jun 8, 1992 |
| 042 | design and implementation of a secure telecommunications network for others and support services therefor | ACTIVE | Jun 8, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 19, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 19, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 17, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 29, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |