USPTO serial 76555291
E-PAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with E-PAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amy E. Carroll
Amy E. Carroll DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLPSUITE 11001500 K STREET, N.W.WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DATA PROCESSORS; MICROPROCESSORS; COMPUTER DEVICES, NAMELY, PERSONAL COMPUTERS, COMPUTER GAME CONSOLES; HAND HELD COMPUTER DEVICES, NAMELY, PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS, COMPUTER GAME TERMINALS, HAND HELD INDUSTRIAL TERMINALS, HAND HELD TABLET COMPUTERS FOR WEB BROWSING AND HAND HELD COMPUTERS; COMPUTER PERIPHERAL DEVICES; COMPUTER PRINTERS; MOBILE PHONES; ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION DEVICES, NAMELY, PAGERS, EMAIL COMPUTER TERMINALS, TELEPHONE SETS WITH SCREENS AND FAX MACHINES; CABLE TELEVISION APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, CABLE TELEVISION DECODERS; DIGITAL PROJECTORS, NAMELY, MULTIMEDIA PROJECTORS, CONFERENCE ROOM PROJECTORS, HOME THEATRE PROJECTORS, VIDEO PROJECTORS AND DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPH PROJECTORS; DIGITAL CAMERAS; COMPUTER MEMORIES, NAMELY, ROM CARDS, CARTRIDGES AND DISCS, COMPUTER MEMORY CARDS CONTAINING CHIPS; COMPUTER CHIPS; DATA STORAGE DEVICES FOR THE RECORDATION OF COMPUTER PROGRAMS, NAMELY DISCS AND CD ROMs; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN BROWSING, MESSAGING, IMAGE VIEWING, INFORMATION RETRIEVAL, NAVIGATION SYSTEMS AND GAMES; COMPUTER GRAPHICS SOFTWARE; GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE SOFTWARE; DIGITAL DOCUMENT PROCESSING COMPUTER SOFTWARE | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | LICENSING OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RELATING TO DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS, MICROPROCESSORS, COMPUTER DEVICE, HAND HELD COMPUTER DEVICES, COMPUTER PERIPHERAL DEVICES, PRINTERS, MOBILE PHONES, ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION DEVICES, CABLE TELEVISION APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS INCLUDING CABLE TELEVISION DECODERS, DIGITAL PROJECTORS, DIGITAL CAMERAS, READ ONLY MEMORIES (ROMS), ROM CARDS, CARTRIDGES AND DISCS, COMPUTER CARDS CONTAINING CHIPS, COMPUTER CHIPS, DATA STORAGE DEVICES FOR THE RECORDAL OF COMPUTER PROGRAMS, COMPUTER PROGRAMS, COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR PRODUCING COMPUTER GRAPHICS, GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE SOFTWARE AND DIGITAL DOCUMENT PROCESSING COMPUTER SOFTWARE; DESIGN OF DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS FOR COMPUTER GRAPHICS AND DIGITAL PROCESSING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Picsel (Research) Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Picsel (Research) Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named E-PAGE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 4, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 4, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 4, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 4, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 21, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 18, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 12, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 2, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |