USPTO serial 76555317
DIMEP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3589459Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 17, 2009
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DIMEP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dimas de Melo Pimenta Sistemas de Ponto e Acesso Ltda.
Sao Paulo, SP, BR
Other trademarks owned by Dimas de Melo Pimenta Sistemas de Ponto e Acesso Ltda.
Dimas de Melo Pimenta Sistemas de Ponto e Acesso Ltda.
Sao Paulo, SP, BR
Other trademarks owned by Dimas de Melo Pimenta Sistemas de Ponto e Acesso Ltda.
Dimas de Melo Pimenta Sistemas de Ponto e Acesso Ltda.
Sao Paulo, SP, BR
Other trademarks owned by Dimas de Melo Pimenta Sistemas de Ponto e Acesso Ltda.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DANIEL F. ZENDEL
DANIEL F. ZENDEL Ladas & Parry LLP1040 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10018-3738UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Automatic turnstiles, namely, devices used to allow people access to a building or other entry one at a time; automated security gates and equipment for access control and security, namely, automatic turnstiles, electric parking gate operators, electronic door openers, access control and alarm monitoring systems, facilities management software, namely, software to control building access and security and computer programs for the enabling of access or entrance control; encoded electronic chip badges and cards for building access and security, and parts for the aforesaid products; digital and computerized time recording clocks for controlling attendance and replacement parts and fittings for these clocks; mechanical and computerized time clocks and replace parts and fittings for these clocks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dimas de Melo Pimenta Sistemas de Ponto e Acesso Ltda.
- Other trademarks owned by Dimas de Melo Pimenta Sistemas de Ponto e Acesso Ltda.
- Other trademarks owned by Dimas de Melo Pimenta Sistemas de Ponto e Acesso Ltda.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named DIMEP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 30, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 22, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 5, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 24, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |