Drawing for LOS 40 PRINCIPALES

USPTO serial 76555332

LOS 40 PRINCIPALES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LOS 40 PRINCIPALES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul F. Kilmer

Paul F. Kilmer Holland & Knight LLP2099 Pennsylvania Avenue, NWSuite 100Washington, DC 20006

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016TRADING CARDS, ENVELOPES; STAMPS, NAMELY, STICKERS; MAGAZINES IN THE FIELD OF MUSIC AND ENTERTAINMENT; JOURNALS AND NEWSPAPERS IN THE FIELD OF MUSIC AND ENTERTAINMENTACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 10, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 9, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 9, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 7, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 7, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 5, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 29, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 29, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 18, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 22, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 22, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 22, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 29, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 28, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 24, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 27, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 27, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 29, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 6, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 17, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 26, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 26, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 18, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 6, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 6, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 6, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 3, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 2, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 31, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 13, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 10, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 8, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 24, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 28, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance