Drawing for FORMULA DRIFT

USPTO serial 76555339

FORMULA DRIFT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FORMULA DRIFT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Francis Y.L. Chen

FRANCIS Y L CHEN LAW OFFICE OF FRANCIS Y L CHEN17700 CASTLETON ST STE 288CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91748UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely arranging and organizing series of automobile racing events; and producing and distributing television programs in the field of automobile racing for distribution via television, cable, digital cable, satellite, videotape, and DVDsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 2, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 12, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 12, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 10, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 13, 2006PGEXPETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED—
Jan 13, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 13, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 12, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 19, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 30, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 14, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 14, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 21, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 21, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 29, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 20, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 16, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 12, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 17, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 10, 2004AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
May 10, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 10, 2004PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
May 10, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance