Drawing for JUST FOR MEN

USPTO serial 76555406

JUST FOR MEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPILS, CAROL A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with JUST FOR MEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert R. Caliri

ROBERT R CALIRI EMRICH & DITHMAR LLC125 S WACKER DR STE 2080CHICAGO, IL 60606-4401UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Kits consisting of electric clippers for scalp hair, electric trimmers for facial hair, hand-operated shears, hair combs, aprons for chest and neck and shoulders for use in connection with clipping and shearing and trimming scalp hair and facial hair, dusting brushes for clothing and head and neck and shoulders, brushes and oil for cleaning and lubricating said clippers and trimmers, and sometimes cases or pouches for the foregoing; kits consisting of electric trimmers for facial hair, hand-operated shears, hair combs, aprons for chest and neck and shoulders for use in connection with trimming and shearing facial hair, and sometimes cases or pouches for the foregoing; electric hair trimmers for nose, ears, and eyebrows, and cases or pouches for the foregoingACTIVE—
011Hand-held electric hair dryersACTIVE—
021Kits consisting of hair brushes and hair combs; hair brushes and hair combs sold as components of hair grooming kitsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 16, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 15, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 12, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 19, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 14, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 17, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance