USPTO serial 76555449
WHY WEIGHT? WOMEN'S TOTAL FITNESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 1, 2005
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WHY WEIGHT? WOMEN'S TOTAL FITNESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Why Weight Total Woman's Fitness, Inc.
Los Angeles, CA
Other trademarks owned by Why Weight Total Woman's Fitness, Inc.
Why Weight Total Woman's Fitness, Inc.
Los Angeles, CA
Other trademarks owned by Why Weight Total Woman's Fitness, Inc.
Why Weight Total Woman's Fitness, Inc.
Los Angeles, CA
Other trademarks owned by Why Weight Total Woman's Fitness, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LORI M LOFSTROM
3800 KILROY AIRPORT WAYSUITE 250LONG BEACH, CA 90806Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Franchising; namely, providing technical assistance in the establishment and/or operation of fitness and nutritional counseling centers | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Oct 8, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Why Weight Total Woman's Fitness, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Why Weight Total Woman's Fitness, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Why Weight Total Woman's Fitness, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named WHY WEIGHT? WOMEN'S TOTAL FITNESS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 9, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 20, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |