USPTO serial 76555471
LEOLUXX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3022436Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 6, 2005
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LEOLUXX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Morton J. Rosenberg
MORTON J ROSENBERG ROSENBERG, KLEIN & LEE3458 ELLICOTT CTR DR STE 101ELLICOTT CITY, MD 21043UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Traffic signal lamps and indications, namely, light emitting diode ball lamps for traffic signal control, light emitting diode arrow lamps for traffic signal control, light emitting diode pedestrian lamps for pedestrian indication, light emitting diode count-down devices for traffic and pedestrian indication, light emitting diode lights for nighttime airfield and sea port traffic guides; safety light gear and products, namely, light emitting diode flashing lights for traffic warnings, light emitting diode roadside markers for nighttime indication, light emitting diode blinking vests for road maintenance personnel, light emitting diode beacons for emergency vehicles, light emitting diode torches and flashlights for nighttime portable indication and light emitting diodes; edge lit signs, namely, light emitting diode luminous edge lit signs; lighted signs; internally illuminated sign and light engines, power supplies, signal controllers and optical lenses for light manipulation, namely, lighting for street name signs, directional signs, advertising signs, exit signs, opening signs, entrance signs, message signs, address name plates, kiosks, posters, and liquid crystal display panels; neon alternative border tube and marking systems comprised of light emitting diode light sources, power supplies, weather-resistant plastic tubing and connectors, and signal controllers, namely, border tubes, color changing pipes, object profile lighting, and cove lighting for decorations; neon alternative channel letter illumination systems comprised of light emitting diode light sources, power supplies, weather-resistant housings and connectors, and signal controllers, namely, light emitting diode light boxes, channel letters and manual boards; night guide marking systems comprised of light emitting diode light sources, power supplies, weather-resistant plastic tubing and connectors, and signal controllers, namely, highway exit ramp border lighting, underground parking structure driveway guide lighting, bridge profile indication lighting for sea or river vehicles, skyscrapers and building top lighting for air vehicles;" | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 13, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LEOTEK ELECTRONIC CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by LEOTEK ELECTRONIC CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by LEOTEK ELECTRONIC CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named LEOLUXX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 8, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 1, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |