Drawing for YIDDISH YOGA

USPTO serial 76555786

YIDDISH YOGA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with YIDDISH YOGA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Theodora Brown

THEODORA BROWN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CLINICUDC DAVID A CLARK SCHOOL OF LAW4200 CONNECTICUT AVE BLDG 38 2ND FL NWWASHINGTON, DC 20008

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Yoga instruction, namely, providing classroom instruction that incorporates Jewish culture into the art of yogaACTIVEJun 17, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 3, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 3, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 3, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 29, 2006EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 6, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 5, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
May 31, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 7, 2006RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Mar 7, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Feb 15, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 2, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 25, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 24, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 24, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 26, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 24, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 18, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 12, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 13, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 18, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance