Drawing for LOW-CARB-BAR

USPTO serial 76555856

LOW-CARB-BAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEIN, JAMES W
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LOW-CARB-BAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Myron Amer

Myron Amer Galgano & Associates, PLLC20 W. Park Avenue, Suite 204Long Beach, NY 11561UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005DIETARY SUPPLEMENTSACTIVESep 22, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 29, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 24, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 12, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 10, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 31, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 31, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 20, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 12, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 7, 2005RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Apr 7, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 7, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 23, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 5, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 30, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 18, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance