Drawing for CYMBAL RECORDS

USPTO serial 76555872

CYMBAL RECORDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3235532Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 1, 2007
Examiner
VLCEK, TOMAS V
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CYMBAL RECORDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009A series of musical sound recordings, namely, CDs, cassette tapes and videocassettesSECTION 18 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 2017CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Sep 15, 2016C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Sep 15, 2016CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 13, 2016CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Aug 29, 2016MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2016MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2016PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 18, 2012NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED—
Oct 18, 20128.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Sep 14, 20128.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
Sep 14, 2012MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2012PRA8POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8—
Aug 25, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 2, 20128.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
Aug 2, 2012MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 1, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 24, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 18, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 15, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 14, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 14, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 30, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 21, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 21, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2006PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 7, 2006PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Apr 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2006PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jan 24, 2006PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Jan 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2006PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jul 29, 2005PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Jul 29, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2005PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jun 9, 2005PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Jun 9, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2005PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Apr 4, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 2, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 7, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 27, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 27, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 6, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance