USPTO serial 76555932
SOULKISS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SOULKISS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Takarazuka, HYOGO, JP
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Folding briefcases, Shoulder bags, Gladstone bags, Briefcases, Suitcases, Carry-on bags, Trunks, Handbags, Boston bags, Schoolchildren's backpacks, Backpacks, Credit card cases, Shopping bags, Purses, Key cases, Wallets, Business card cases, Telescopic umbrellas, Rainproof parasols, Beach umbrellas, Parasols, Umbrellas, Dog collars | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Jackets, Jogging pants, Sweat pants, Suits, Skirts, Ski jackets, Ski pants, Trousers, Overcoats, Raincoats, Cardigans, Sweaters, Vests, Blouses, Polo shirts, Night gowns, Negligees, Pajamas, Bath robes, Camisoles, Undershirts, Chemises, Panties, shorts and briefs, Brassieres, Aprons, Socks and stockings, Scarves, Gloves and mittens, Bandanas, Mufflers, Nightcaps, Headwear, Belts for clothing, Rain boots, Lace boots, Training shoes, Sandals, Shoes, Half boots, Women's shoes, Canvas shoes, Infant's shoes and boots, Sandal-clogs, Slippers, Anoraks, Warm-up coats, Ski suits for competition, Headbands, Wind-jackets, Uniforms and stockings, Wristband, Soccer shoes, Ski boots, Gymnastic sneakers, Tennis shoes, Climbing boots, Basketball shoes, Boxing shoes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 2, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 2, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 11, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 11, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |