Drawing for CO2 COSMETICS

USPTO serial 76556142

CO2 COSMETICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHARPER JR, SAM
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CO2 COSMETICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Norman E. Lehrer

NORMAN E LEHRER1205 N KINGS HWYCHERRY HILL, NJ 08034UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003cosmetics, namely, foundation, eyeliner, eyeshadow, blush and make-upACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 13, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 9, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 9, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 5, 2005EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 8, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 8, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 1, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 31, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 21, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 11, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 11, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 20, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 19, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance