USPTO serial 76556593
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
31660, Bessieres, FR
31660, Bessieres, FR
Rueil-Malmaison Cedex, FR
Rueil-Malmaison Cedex, FR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey A. Smith
JEFFREY A SMITH MILLEN, WHITE, ZELANO & BRANIGAN PC2200 CLARENDON BLVD STE 1400ARLINGTON, VA 22201UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CHEMICALS INTENDED FOR TREATMENT AND PURIFICATION OF WATER FOR SWIMMING POOLS, WATERWAYS AND FOUNTAINS; WATER TREATMENT CHEMICALS FOR INDUSTRIAL USE | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | TECHNICAL CONSULTATION, WORKING OUT PLANS, NAMELY, DRAFTING AND DESIGNING, TECHNICAL PROJECT STUDIES, RESEARCH AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT, RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING SURVEYING AND DEVELOPMENT REPORTS IN THE FIELD OF PROCESSING OF WATER FOR SWIMMING POOLS, WATERWAYS AND FOUNTAINS; WORKING ON AND EVALUATION OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES; WORKING ON AND EVALUATION OF CHEMICAL SYNTHESES; MEASUREMENT EVALUATIONS IN THE FIELD OF PROCESSING OF WATER FOR SWIMMING POOLS, WATERWAY AND FOUNTAINS | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |