Drawing for RICHARDS RIO DE JANEIRO

USPTO serial 76556626

RICHARDS RIO DE JANEIRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 608
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LORENZO, GEORGE M
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RICHARDS RIO DE JANEIRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Allison Strickland

J ALLISON STRICKLAND FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018wallets, backpacks, handbags, beach bags, traveling bags, briefcases, suitcases, valises, traveling trunks, parasols and umbrellasACTIVE—
025men's, women's and children's clothing, namely, briefs, boxer shorts, drawers, namely underwear, ties, suits, tuxedos, cutaways namely cut pants, trunks, thongs, jackets, pants, overalls, Bermuda shorts, shorts, shirts, t-shirts, pajamas, robes, hats, caps, bandanas, scarves, gloves, blazers, sweaters, coats, socks, clothing belts, shoes, sandals, moccasins, flip-flops, boots, blouses, bathing suits, bikinis, bras, blouses, skirts, dresses and shawlsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 2, 2007PRRDPETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST DENIED—
Feb 2, 2007PRRRPETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2006PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Nov 13, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 10, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 12, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 12, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 18, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 29, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 15, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 15, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 5, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 5, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 19, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance