CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for NOBO

USPTO serial 76556698

NOBO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NOBO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Bath sponges; bath accessories in ceramic, glass and plastic, namely cups, toothbrush holders, soap dishes, trash cans, toilet bowl caddies, soap dispensers, and toilet and facial tissue paper dispensers; hair brushesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 20, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 20, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 28, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 28, 2008DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 20, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 20, 2007DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 20, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 20, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 23, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 18, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 18, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 17, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 20, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 20, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 20, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 27, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 2, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 2, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 19, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 19, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 19, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 3, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 21, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 27, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 20, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 20, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 21, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance