Drawing for RIPE & JUICY

USPTO serial 76556943

RIPE & JUICY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RIPE & JUICY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William C. Steffin

WILLIAM C STEFFIN LEWIS, BRISBOIS, BISGAARD & SMITH LLP221 N FIGUEROA ST STE 1200LOS ANGELES, CA 90012UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Fresh fruits and vegetables conditioned to enhance flavor and freshnessACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 5, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 5, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 6, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 6, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 31, 2006EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 1, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 1, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 1, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 31, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 16, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 21, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 20, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance