USPTO serial 76557151
MAIL MASTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAIL MASTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
W. Jeffrey Brown
W JEFFREY BROWN J. BROWN & ASSOCIATES, LLC3773 CHERRY CRK DR NSTE 575DENVER, CO 80209Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Freight sorting, handling and receiving; services of mail sorting, handling and receiving; advertising and business services, namely business management; franchising services, namely offering technical assistance in the establishment and/or operation of retail mailing, shipping, packaging, faxing and electronic communications outlets; retail store services offering stamps and office supplies; photocopy services and document reproduction services | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2004 |
| 039 | Packaging articles for transportation; transportation of letters, documents, communications, printed matter, and other goods and property by means of truck transport, rail transport, and air transport; additional related services, namely, storage, packing and delivery with respect to the foregoing | ACTIVE | May 10, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 5, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 7, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | RFRR | REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 8, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 3, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |