USPTO serial 76557287
MRE MASTER OF REAL ESTATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRADLEY, EVELYN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MRE MASTER OF REAL ESTATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark A. Meyer
MARK A MEYER ROTHGERBER JOHNSON & LYONS LLP1200 17TH ST STE 3000DENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pre-recorded audio cassettes, audio tapes, videotapes, computer disks, compact disks, DVD disks and filmstrips all in the field of real estate education and training; educational computer software featuring instruction in real estate; educational computer programs featuring instruction in real estate; electronic media, namely, images, text and audio data recorded on audio cassettes, audio tapes, videotapes, computer disks, compact disks, DVD disks and filmstrips featuring real estate education and training | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Colorado Association of Realtors
- Other trademarks owned by Colorado Association of Realtors
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named MRE MASTER OF REAL ESTATE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 27, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 27, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 5, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 16, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |