USPTO serial 76557424
NIKKO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NIKKO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
AVS TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Other trademarks owned by AVS TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Montreal, Quebec H9P 2N4, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Grant A. Monachino, James A. Dimitrijevs, Robert C. Baraona, David B. Cupar, Todd A. Benni, Robert H. Earp, III, David Movius, Peter Kraguljac, and John T. Kalnay
GRANT A MONACHINO MCDONALD HOPKINS CO LPA600 SUPERIOR AVE E STE 2100CLEVELAND, OH 44114UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | HIGH FIDELITY EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, RADIO RECEIVERS, AMPLIFIERS, TUNERS, SPEAKERS,CONSOLES AND CABINETS DESIGNED THEREFOR, AUDIO CASSETTE DECKS, GRAPHIC EQUALIZERS, TURNTABLES, COMPACT DISC PLAYERS, AUDIO SYSTEMS, DJ EQUIPMENT,KARAOKE SYSTEMS; PORTABLE AUDIO DEVICES SUCH AS BOOM BOXES, INTERNET AUDIO DEVICES, NAMELY, MP3 PLAYERS, DVD AUDIO PLAYERS, LASER DISC PLAYERS, CD CHANGERS, CD PLAYERS, HOME THEATRE IN A BOX, AUDIO ANT) VIDEO BLANK MEDIA, DIGITAL IMAGING/VIDEO EDITING ACCESSORIES, DIGITAL VIDEO CAPTURE DEVICES, ELECTRONIC GAMING ACCESSORIES SUCH AS CORDS, CABLES, JOYSTICKS; HOME APPLIANCES, SUCH AS AIR CONDITIONERS, HOUSE WARES, INTERNET-ENABLED APPLIANCES, MICROWAVE OVENS, VACUUMS; HOME DATA NETWORKING SYSTEMS SUCH AS PHONE LINE-BASED SYSTEMS, NETWORK CARDS, RESIDENTIAL GATEWAYS, WIRELESS-BASED SYSTEMS, WIRES AND CABLES, CB RADIOS, CAR AUDIO, IN-CAR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, GLOBAL POSITIONING SATELLITE NAVIGATION AND COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT, GENERAL MOBILE RADIO SERVICE RADIOS, MARINE PRODUCTS, BLANK CDR DISCS, CD BURNERS, UNIVERSAL REMOTE CONTROLS, SPECIALTY PRODUCTS, SCANNERS, RADAR DETECTION, REMOTE STARTERS, VEHICLE SECURITY, MOBILE OFFICE EQUIPMENT, PERSONAL ELECTRONICS INCLUDING BATTERIES, CLOCK RADIOS, HOME HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS, MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS, NOVELTIES, WATCHES, PHOTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT, SATELLITE SYSTEMS,TELEPHONES AND ACCESSORIES, TVS, VCRS, WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DEVICES, NAMELY,CELLULAR PHONES, DIGITAL WIRELESS PHONES, PAGERS, TWO-WAY RADIOS; ACCESSORIES AND INTERNET SOFTWARE RELATING TO THE FOREGOING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |