USPTO serial 76557678
MONEYWISE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MONEYWISE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bryce K. Earl
BRYCE K EARL SANTORO, DRIGGS, WALCH, KEARNEY400 S 4TH ST 3RD FLLAS VEGAS, NV 89101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in the fields of financial, real estate and insurance management, planning and education; computer software for accessing, facilitating, conducting, analyzing, tracking, maintaining, updating or reporting banking, loan, credit line, cash flow, investment, real estate, charity and insurance transactions, records and information; computer software for electronic funds transfer | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 10, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 10, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 29, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 19, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |