USPTO serial 76558019
MILLENNIL PRO-LINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OKEKE, BENJAMIN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MILLENNIL PRO-LINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vista Hermosa, Pueblo Nuevo, PA
Vista Hermosa, Pueblo Nuevo, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey L. Costellia
Jeffrey L. Costellia NIXON PEABODY LLP.401 9TH STREET, N.W.SUITE 900WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2128Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal house numbers and letters; door chains | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Power tools, namely, drills and drill bits; angle grinders; bench grinders; polishers; electric screwdrivers; circular saws and air compressors | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Hand tools, namely, screwdriver sets, shovels, scrapers, socket sets, bolt cutters, axes, hand jacks; and displacement pump sprayers attached to a garden hose for spraying liquid herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers and insecticides | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Standing fans; plumbing supplies, namely, drain tailpieces; ballcocks, bar faucets, toilets, lavatories, coal barbecues and electric fans | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Wheelbarrows | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Millennil Investment Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Millennil Investment Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named MILLENNIL PRO-LINE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 5, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 6, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 28, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 29, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 7, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 2, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 6, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 27, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 23, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 29, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 28, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 28, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |