Drawing for HISTORIC BOTANICAL COLLECTION

USPTO serial 76558163

HISTORIC BOTANICAL COLLECTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ESTRADA, LINDA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HISTORIC BOTANICAL COLLECTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patrick H. Ballew

Patrick H. Ballew Stratton Ballew PLLC213 S. 12th AvenueYakima, WA 98902UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Garden supplies, namely potting soil and fertilizers for domestic and agricultural useACTIVE—
008Hand-operated garden tools, namely, pruning shears, grass shears, garden and utility scissors, transplanters, cultivators, rakes, hoes, spades, digging forks, shovels, trowels, weeders and tool apronsACTIVE—
016Annual diaries, calendars, address books, postcards, note cards, bookmarks, paper gift wrap, gift cards, greeting cards, writing paper, ball point pens, colored pencils and stencilsACTIVE—
019Garden statuaries of stone, marble or concreteACTIVE—
020Home furnishings, namely, hand-held mirrors, picture frames, plaques and pillows; and garden furnitureACTIVE—
021Housewares and glass, namely, coffee mugs, plates, and bowls; ornaments made of china, crystal, glass, porcelain or terra cotta; cookie cutters, canister sets, beverage can coolers and lunch boxesACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, t-shirts, sweatshirts, hats and apronsACTIVE—
028Flying discs; Christmas tree ornamentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 13, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 13, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 14, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 26, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 26, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 23, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 22, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 22, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 29, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 29, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 29, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 27, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 27, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 25, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 25, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 29, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 6, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 17, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 25, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 22, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 21, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 21, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 21, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 20, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 7, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 27, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 6, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 23, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 2, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance