USPTO serial 76558689
PREMIUM RECYCLED PARTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PREMIUM RECYCLED PARTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TOD R. NISSLE
TOD R NISSLE TOD R NISSLE PCPO BOX 55630PHOENIX, AZ 85078UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | PROVIDING RECYCLED AUTOMOBILE PARTS; PROMOTING AND SETTING UP REGIONAL ALLIANCES COMPRISED OF INDEPENDENT AUTOMOBILE PART RECYCLING COMPANIES TO MARKET RECYCLED AUTO PARTS; PROMOTING AND/;OR MARKETING TO INSURANCE COMPANIES RECYCLED AUTOMOBILE PARTS PROVIDED BY AUTO PART RECYCLING COMPANIES AND/OR ALLIANCES OF AUTO PART RECYCLING COMPANIES; PROVIDING A QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM FOR RECYCLED AUTO PARTS; PROMOTING COOPERATION BETWEEN INDEPENDENT AUTO PART RECYCLING COMPANIES WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF RECYCLED AUTOMOBILE PARTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 27, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 25, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |