Drawing for TRANSPILLAR

USPTO serial 76558731

TRANSPILLAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, RONALD G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRANSPILLAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew D. Price

ANDREW D PRICE VENABLE LLP575 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-1601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Proteins produced by transgenic caterpillars for medical, pharmaceutical, scientific, agricultural, and industrial research use, and protein-based scientific, agricultural , and industrial products; and reagents for medical and pharmaceutical research use, scientific use, agricultural use , and industrial useACTIVE—
009Laboratory equipment, namely, incubating and harvesting apparatus for use in rearing transgenic caterpillarsACTIVE—
031Live transgenic caterpillars for use in scientific, medical, pharmaceutical, agricultural, and industrial research and commercial products and processes; and feed for transgenic caterpillarsACTIVE—
040Custom manufacture of transgenic proteins for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 7, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 7, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 21, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 2, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 2, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 13, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 24, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 21, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 9, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 22, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 21, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 21, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 4, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 4, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 5, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 4, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 14, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance