USPTO serial 76558771
FLORANET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITE, RICHARD F
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLORANET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KEVIN W. GUYNN
KEVIN W. GUYNN Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd.Suite 2500300 South Wacker DriveChicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | MARKETING, NAMELY, DIRECT MAIL ADVERTISING, PRINT MEDIA ADVERTISING, DISSEMINATION OF ADVERTISING MATTER, TELEMARKETING AND PROVIDING MARKETING INFORMATION VIA WEBSITES FOR FLORAL PRODUCTS, FLOWERS, PLANTS AND RELATED SUPPLY PRODUCTS PURCHASED, SOLD OR USED BY DISTRIBUTORS AND RETAILERS; RETAIL AND WHOLESALE ORDERING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF FLORAL, FLOWER, PLANTS AND RELATED SUPPLY PRODUCTS VIA CONNECTIONS TO A GLOBAL COMMUNICATION AND ECOMMERCE NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | DISTRIBUTION AND DELIVERY OF FLORAL, FLOWER, PLANTS AND RELATED SUPPLY PRODUCTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 10, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 26, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 9, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 19, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 1, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 25, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 17, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |