USPTO serial 76558910
SYNCSAFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAN, DAWN L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SYNCSAFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin R. Martin
KEVIN R MARTIN MCNICHOLS RANDICK O'DEA & TOOLIATOS LLP5000 HOPYARD RD STE 400PLEASANTON, CA 94588UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on Intent to Use) REMOTE ACCESS AND SECURITY SYSTEM CONSISTING OF FINGERPRINT VERIFICATION TOOLS, NAMELY, FINGERPRINT SCANNERS, AND SECURITY DEVICES, NAMELY, FINGERPRINT SCANNERS; BIOMETRIC EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, FINGERPRINT SCANNERS; BIOMETRIC ENABLED SYSTEMS COMPRISING BIOMETRIC SENSORS AND READING DEVICES, NAMELY, FINGERPRINT SCANNERS, COMPUTER PERIPHERALS, COMPUTER HARDWARE, INTERNET APPLICANCES, NAMELY, FINGERPRINT SCANNERS, AND ACCESS CONTROL DEVICES, NAMELY, FINGERPRINT SCANNERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR SECURITY AND VERIFICATION OF IDENTITY AND CREDENTIALS; ELECTRONIC AUTHENTICATION PRODUCTS FOR AUTHENTICATING USERS FOR PURPOSES OF ACCESS, NAMELY, FINGERPRINT SCANNERS; CONTACT IMAGING DEVICE, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC BIOMETRIC SCANNERS FOR USE IN IMAGING PORTIONS OF A HUMAN BODY, NAMELY, FINGERPRINTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | (Based on Use in Commerce) PROVIDING INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER SYSTEM SECURITY VIA THE INTERNET; COMPUTER SYSTEM SECURITY SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING FINGERPRINT DATA MANAGEMENT AND VERIFICATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF DETECTING SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY AND PROTECTING AGAINST POTENTIAL INTRUSION FOR COMPUTER SYSTEMS VIA THE INTERNET OR VIA NETWORK OR VIA STAND ALONE COMPUTER | ACTIVE | Feb 17, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 29, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 4, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 2, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 9, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 10, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |