USPTO serial 76558928
WEIDER WELLNESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAHONEY, PAULA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WEIDER WELLNESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Norman Zafman
NORMAN ZAFMAN BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVDFL 7LOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1019Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Men's, women's and children's apparel, namely, headwear; footwear; and outerwear, namely, shirts, pants, T-shirts, shorts, blouses, suits, swimwear, lingerie, sweatshirts, underwear, jackets, dresses, skirts, gloves, bathrobes, nightgowns and socks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 2, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2013 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 17, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 16, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 23, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 3, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 8, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 19, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 2, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |