USPTO serial 76559008
CWIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CWIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 1J8, CA
Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 1J8, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert P. Ducatman
ROBERT P DUCATMAN JONES DAY901 LAKESIDE AVE E STE 2NORTH POINTCLEVELAND, OH 44114-1190Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for the recordation and verification of the skills, certifications and personal information of workers | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation of computer systems and installation of computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer software consultation with respect to the utilization and operation of computer software for the recordation and verification of the skills, certifications and personal information of workers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pace Integration Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Pace Integration Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CWIC
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 3, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |