USPTO serial 76559263
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Charlotte, NC
Salt Lake City, UT
Salt Lake City, UT
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jayne Conway Hunter
Jayne Conway Hunter Hunter Law Firm, PLLC300 East Kingston AvenueSuite 200Charlotte, NC 28203| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs and computer software that collect data, test data, screen data, detect problems, identify problems, evaluate data, track data, monitor, document, report, draw conclusions, describe alternatives, analyze alternatives, and make decisions, with respect to medical treatment, medical care, health care, preventative health care, physical therapy, nutritional therapy, drug therapy, surgery recovery therapy, gene therapy, psychological therapy, medical testing, diet, surgery, vaccinations, medications, adverse medications, antibiotics, medical records, medical data, medical equipment, medical supplies, disease, infectious disease, sickness, illness, infection, infective agents, microbials, antimicrobials, biological agent exposure, radiation exposure, fever, injury, and medical conditions of individuals and populations; and computer programs and computer software that detect and identify incidence rates, unusual rates, outbreaks and patterns of sickness, illness, disease, clinical conditions and related symptoms and test results in individuals and populations, and related geographic and demographic factors and aspects | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 15, 2004 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 17, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 16, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 27, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 4, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |