Drawing for EXPERT GARDENER

USPTO serial 76559355

EXPERT GARDENER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEPHENS, SONYA B
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EXPERT GARDENER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Plant food; lawn and plant fertilizer for domestic use; potting soil; compost; spike-shaped fertilizer for houseplants; soil conditioners for domestic useACTIVE—
007Mechanical spreaders for seed and dry lawn chemicalsACTIVE—
008Hand tools, namely, shovels, picks, wire nippers, trowels, weed forks, spades, and hoes; gardening tools, namely, shovels, picks, wire nippers, trowels, weed forks, spades, and hoes; hand-operated spreaders for seed and dry lawn chemicals; hand-operated shears; prunersACTIVE—
011Irrigation sprinklersACTIVE—
012Wheel barrowsACTIVE—
017Weed mats made of recycled rubber for preventing weed growth; garden hosesACTIVE—
020Non-metal lawn edgingACTIVE—
021Lawn sprinklers; gardening glovesACTIVE—
025Garden apparel, namely, aprons, hats, bootsACTIVE—
031Living plants and live flowers; live grass; vegetable seeds and flower seedsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 11, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 11, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 11, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 8, 2006EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 9, 2006GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Feb 7, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 9, 2005ATRQATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED—
Sep 7, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 7, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 7, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 7, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 2, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 2, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 5, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 14, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 5, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance