USPTO serial 76559466
SOJITZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 14, 2010
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with SOJITZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chiyoda-ku, JP
TOKYO, JP
TOKYO, JP
Nissho Iwai - Nichimen Holdings Corporation
Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by Nissho Iwai - Nichimen Holdings Corporation
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas W. Brooke
Thomas W. Brooke HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP800 17th Street, NWStuie 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Wholesale services, namely, wholesale distributorships featuring energy and fuels, metal resource materials and metal products, chemicals and chemical products, synthetic resins and synthetic resin products, foods and textiles | ACTIVE | Sep 3, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SOJITZ CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by SOJITZ CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by SOJITZ CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Nissho Iwai - Nichimen Holdings Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named SOJITZ
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2020 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 19, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 19, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 11, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 18, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS NOT UPDATED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 12, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 4, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 18, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 29, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 4, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 20, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 6, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 30, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 12, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 6, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |