USPTO serial 76559579
LOW CARB CRAZY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LOW CARB CRAZY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy R. Kroboth
TIMOTHY R KROBOTH5501 PROVIDENCE COUNTRY CLUB DRCHARLOTTE, NC 28277UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Low carbohydrate foods, namely, frozen prepared entrees consisting primarily of vegetables and cheese with pasta, frozen prepared entrees consisting primarily of meat or seafood and vegetables and cheese with pasta, pork rinds, roasted nuts, jellies, jams, soy-based and flax seed-based snack foods, dairy-based dips, and snack dips excluding salsa and sauces used as dips | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Low carbohydrate foods, namely, bread, pancake, waffle and muffin mixes, breadcrumbs, pasta, tortillas, soy flour, cheesecake, ice cream, corn-based snack foods, flavoring syrups and pancake syrups, salsa and sauces used as dips, sauces, and salad dressing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LOW CARB CRAZY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LOW CARB CRAZY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named LOW CARB CRAZY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 6, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 21, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 29, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 9, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2004 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |