USPTO serial 76559644
ACCESS TO HOLLYWOOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAN, DAWN L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ACCESS TO HOLLYWOOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID L SIGALOW
DAVID L SIGALOW ALLEN DYER DOPPELT MILBRATH & GILCHRIST255 S ORANGE AVE STE 1401ORLANDO, FL 32801UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely conducting courses, conferences, workshops and seminars featuring the program directing, producing, cinematography, editing, production design, sound recording, screen writing and digital media mixing, all in the fields of audiovisual media, motion pictures, digital presentations for film, films, and television programs; providing courses of instruction in art, music, radio, film, video, television, digital media, web design, computer animation, game design, and live event production | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Los Angeles Film School, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by The Los Angeles Film School, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named ACCESS TO HOLLYWOOD
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 16, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 18, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 23, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 4, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 13, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |