Drawing for NEW ORLEANS FAMOUS FRIED CHICKEN

USPTO serial 76559841

NEW ORLEANS FAMOUS FRIED CHICKEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2920181Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 18, 2005
Examiner
HWANG, JOHN C B
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEW ORLEANS FAMOUS FRIED CHICKEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael D Simmons

NEW ORLEANS FAMOUS FRIED CHICKEN OF AMERICA INC1554 WEST PEACE STREETCANTON, MS 39046UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Fried chickenSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDOct 1, 1976

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2019C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Dec 13, 2019CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 12, 2019CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Sep 12, 2019PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 2, 2015NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2015RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Feb 2, 201589AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Feb 2, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 16, 2015E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 10, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 20118.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Jan 28, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 18, 2011ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 31, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2005R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Nov 22, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 22, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 14, 2004CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Oct 1, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 15, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 15, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 7, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 9, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance