Drawing for ULTRAGRIP+

USPTO serial 76559874

ULTRAGRIP+

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
YAO, GRETTA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ULTRAGRIP+?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jody H. Drake

Jody H. Drake SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W.WASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006PIPES; TUBES; FITTINGS AND PARTS FOR TUBES; COUPLINGS, CONNECTORS, VALVES, JOINTS, ADAPTERS FOR REPAIR CLAMPS FOR ALL PIPES AND TUBES; ALL MADE WHOLLY OR PRINCIPALLY OF METAL; AND PARTS AND FITTINGS FOR ALL THE AFORESAID GOODSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 22, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 22, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 13, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 12, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
May 12, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Apr 23, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Apr 23, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 22, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Oct 22, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Oct 22, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 23, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Apr 23, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Apr 23, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 8, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Oct 8, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Oct 8, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 23, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Apr 23, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 23, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 23, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 31, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 11, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 27, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 25, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 17, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Nov 13, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
May 3, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Oct 13, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Apr 12, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Oct 7, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Oct 6, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Sep 14, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 14, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 9, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 9, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance