Drawing for EE EURO RELOGIOS

USPTO serial 76560062

EE EURO RELOGIOS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EE EURO RELOGIOS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cristina A. Carvalho

CRISTINA A CARVALHO ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHN, PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014CLOCKS, ALARM CLOCKS, ATOMIC CLOCKS, MASTER CLOCKS, CONTROL CLOCKS, ELECTRIC CLOCKS, BARRELS FOR CLOCK- AND WATCH-MAKING, CASES FOR CLOCK- AND WATCH-MAKING, ANCHORS FOR CLOCK- AND WATCH-MAKING, PARTS FOR CLOCKS, WATCHES, STOP WATCHES, WRISTWATCHES, ELECTRIC WATCHES, PARTS FOR WATCHES, CHRONOGRAPHS FOR USE AS WATCHES, CHRONOMETERS, SUN DIALS, WATCH BANDS, WATCH CASES, CLOCK CASES, WATCH CHAINS, WATCH MOVEMENTS, WATCH STRAPS, WATCH CRYSTALS, WATCH GLASSES, WATCH SPRINGS, CLOCKWORKS; PENDULUMS, CLOCK MOVEMENTS, WATCH HANDS, CLOCK HANDSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 12, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 12, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 24, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 4, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 4, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 12, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 11, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 30, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 24, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 19, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 29, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 13, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 13, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 3, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 3, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 27, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 9, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance