Drawing for GREAT ADVENTURES

USPTO serial 76560126

GREAT ADVENTURES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GREAT ADVENTURES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kirstin M. Jahn

PAMELA J BOWSHER SIERRA DESIGN GROUPATTN LAW DEPT6601 S BERMUDA RDLAS VEGAS, NV 89119

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Gaming equipment, namely, gaming machines, with or without video output, electronic gaming machines, electro-mechanical gaming machines and mechanical gaming machines; lottery machines; computer software for gaming and lottery gamesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 5, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 5, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 5, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 20, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 11, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 21, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 1, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 1, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 30, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 7, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 7, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 6, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 16, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 1, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 24, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 13, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 10, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance