USPTO serial 76560255
SO-NET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SO-NET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert B.G. Horowitz
Robert B.G. Horowitz BAKER & HOSTETLER45 ROCKEFELLER PLAZANEW YORK, NY 10111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | printed books and magazines on the subjects of consumer products reviews, music, motion pictures and video games | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | providing information via the Internet relating to finance; providing information via the Internet relating to real estate | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | providing travel information via the Internet; travel tour and transportation information; electronic data storage | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | providing weather information via the Internet; hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; providing online registration of domain names for identification of users on a global computer network; computer services, namely, designing and implementing web sites for others; providing technical information via the Internet relating to computer hardware and software and electric apparatuses in the nature of audio and video equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | providing online reviews of restaurants; providing food and drink preparation information via the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | providing health and beauty care and cosmetic information via the Internet; providing health information regarding medicines and nursing care via the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | providing a selection of on-line electronic greeting cards via the Internet; providing clothing fashion information via the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sony Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks owned by Sony Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named SO-NET
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 9, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 1, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 12, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 14, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 6, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 28, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 7, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 10, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 26, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 5, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 5, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 21, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 16, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |