USPTO serial 76560271
MEDISTAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MEDISTAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-37070 Göttingen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dennis E. Stenzel
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | NON-SURGICAL BIOCHEMICAL LABORATORY APPARATUS, NAMELY, PARTICLE FILTERS, UV AIR STERILIZATION CHAMBERS, LAMINAR WORKFLOW BENCHES, CULTURING VESSELS EQUIPPED WITH ROTATING BEDS, POROUS CARRIER DISKS FOR THE GROWTH OF ANCHORAGE-DEPENDENT CELLS, BIODEGRADABLE SCAFFOLDS FOR CULTURING CELL- AND TISSUE-IMPLANTS, TEMPERATURE SENSORS, pH SENSORS and DISSOLVED OXYGEN SENSORS; DIGITAL CONTROLLERS WITH GRAPHICS INTERFACE and DISPLAY FOR CONTROLLING and MEASURING OUTPUT FROM ALL OF THE FOREGOING APPARATUS, ALL OF THE FOREGOING APPARATUS AND DIGITAL CONTROLLERS FOR CULTURING AND ENGINEERING CELLS AND TISSUES | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | NON-SURGICAL GENE THERAPY APPARATUS FOR MEDICAL USE, NAMELY, PARTICLE FILTERS, UV AIR STERILIZATION CHAMBERS, LAMINAR WORKFLOW BENCHES, CULTURING VESSELS EQUIPPED WITH ROTATING BEDS, POROUS CARRIER DISKS FOR THE GROWTH OF ANCHORAGE-DEPENDENT CELLS, BIODEGRADABLE SCAFFOLDS FOR CULTURING CELL- AND TISSUE-IMPLANTS, TEMPERATURE SENSORS, pH SENSORS AND DISSOLVE OXYGEN SENSORS, AND DIGITAL CONTROLLERS WITH GRAPHICS INTERFACE AND DISPLAY FOR CONTROLLING AND MEASURING OUTPUT FROM ALL OF THE FOREGOING APPARATUS SOLD AS A UNIT, ALL OF THE FOREGOING APPARATUS AND DIGITAL CONTROLLERS FOR CULTURING AND ENGINEERING CELLS AND TISSUES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 11, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 30, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 23, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |