USPTO serial 76560290
AIMS MULTIMEDIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PARK, JENNY K
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AIMS MULTIMEDIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony V. Lupo
ANTHONY V LUPO ARENT FOX PLOTKIN & KAHN PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Online educational services, namely, educational testing services and online library services, namely, providing electronic library services featuring photographs and pictures | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 9, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |