Drawing for ALEVIA

USPTO serial 76560419

ALEVIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AWRICH, ELLEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALEVIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Darin Margules

DARIN MARGULES TYRE KAMINS KATZ GRANOF & MENES1880 CENTURY PARK E STE 300LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware, namely laptop and notebook computersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 11, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 11, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 22, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 22, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 28, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 28, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 27, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 27, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 27, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 28, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 1, 2005TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 1, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 1, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 27, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 27, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 27, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 2, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 10, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 26, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 25, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 25, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 11, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance