USPTO serial 76560855
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sherry H. Flax
SHERRY H FLAX SAUL EWING LLP500 E PRATT ST STE 900BALTIMORE, MD 21202UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | real estate mortgage banking and lending services; loan origination and financing via a global communications network | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 2002 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 27, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |