USPTO serial 76561030
DAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert E. Bushnell
Robert E. Bushnell Robert E Bushnell & Law Firm2029 K Street, N.W.Suite 600,Washington DC, DC 20006-1004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | BLANKETS, NAMELY NON-ELECTRIC TEXTILE BLANKETS FOR GENERAL USE, BLANKETS FOR HOUSEHOLD USES, FOR OUTDOOR AND INDOOR USES, FOR PERSONAL AND DOMESTIC USES, FOR USE DURING TRAVEL, FOR INSTITUTIONAL USES, FOR USE BY MEN, WOMEN, CHILDREN AND INFANTS, AND FABRICS FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF NON-ELECTRIC TEXTILE BLANKETS FOR GENERAL USE; QUILTS; BED BLANKETS; BED COVERS; RAISED FABRICS FOR GENERAL USE, FOR DOMESTIC USES, FOR INSTITUTIONAL USES, FOR USE BY MEN, WOMEN, CHILDREN AND INFANTS, AND FOR USE IN UPHOLSTERY AND BEDDING; CHENILLE FABRICS; PILE FABRICS FOR GENERAL USE AND PILE FABRICS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF FLOOR COVERINGS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 13, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 5, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2004 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |