Drawing for LIFEHEART METS METER

USPTO serial 76561048

LIFEHEART METS METER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BOONE, JOHN C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIFEHEART METS METER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEPHANIE K. WADE

STEPHANIE K. WADE Dickstein Shapiro LLP1825 Eye Street, NWWashington, DC 20006-5403UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044PROVIDING AN INTERACTIVE WEB SITE FOR CONVERTING TREADMILL TEST RESULTS INTO DAILY ACTIVITIES THAT A PATIENT MAY PERFORM SAFELYACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 28, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 28, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 17, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 17, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 17, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 24, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 15, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 15, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 15, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 5, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 5, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 5, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 5, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 5, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 5, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 27, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 5, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 15, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 30, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 25, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 18, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 18, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 16, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance