USPTO serial 76561109
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karl Hormann
KARL HORMANN LAW OFFICES OF KARL HORMANNPO BOX 381516CAMBRIDGE, MA 02238-1516UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Common metals and their alloys; metal building materials; goods made of metal; prefabricated construction components made of metal with a filler of insulating material; prefabricated wire grids bodies with a filler of insulating material as construction materials for walls and ceilings of building | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Construction materials (non-metallic); synthetic and mineral materials for filling prefabricated metallic wire grid panels for walls and ceilings of buildings | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Construction (residential and commercial buildings); Construction of residential and coimmercial buildings using prefarbicated metallic wire grid panels for walls and ceilings; Installation and plumbing services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 31, 2004 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |