Drawing for EVG-3D

USPTO serial 76561109

EVG-3D

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SALEMI, DOMINICK
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with EVG-3D?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karl Hormann

KARL HORMANN LAW OFFICES OF KARL HORMANNPO BOX 381516CAMBRIDGE, MA 02238-1516UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Common metals and their alloys; metal building materials; goods made of metal; prefabricated construction components made of metal with a filler of insulating material; prefabricated wire grids bodies with a filler of insulating material as construction materials for walls and ceilings of buildingACTIVE
019Construction materials (non-metallic); synthetic and mineral materials for filling prefabricated metallic wire grid panels for walls and ceilings of buildingsACTIVE
037Construction (residential and commercial buildings); Construction of residential and coimmercial buildings using prefarbicated metallic wire grid panels for walls and ceilings; Installation and plumbing servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 29, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 29, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 31, 2004NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED
Aug 19, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 19, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 2, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 29, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 17, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 12, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance