Drawing for THREE O'S

USPTO serial 76561136

THREE O'S

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with THREE O'S?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marvin H. Kleinberg

Marvin H. Kleinberg Kleinberg & Lerner, LLP1875 Century Park East, Suite 1150Los Angeles, CA 90067-2501UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Automobile parts, namely, car wheel rimsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 16, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 8, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 20, 2006MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 20, 2006ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 20, 2006OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 20, 2006OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Nov 10, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 9, 2005OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 5, 2005ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jul 7, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 18, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 17, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 14, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 4, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 28, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 28, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 24, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 17, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance