Drawing for CONNECTED ARCHIVESTORE

USPTO serial 76561141

CONNECTED ARCHIVESTORE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PAPPAS, MATTHEW
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONNECTED ARCHIVESTORE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward F. Perlman

EDWARD F PERLMAN WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS PC600 ATLANTIC AVEBOSTON, MA 02210-2206UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for data archiving and computer software for indexing, searching, archiving, recovery, reduction, protection, storage and/or management of computer data, electronic files and electronic communications related to electronic mailACTIVE—
039Computer services, namely, data archiving services providing computer programs and facilities associated with indexing, searching, archiving, recovery, reduction, protection, storage and/or management of computer data, electronic files and electronic communication related to electronic mailACTIVE—
042Computer services, namely, technical support services providing computer programs and facilities associated with indexing, searching, archiving, recovery, reduction, protection, storage and/or management of computer data, electronic files and electronic communication related to electronic mailACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 6, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 13, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 13, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 13, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 21, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 13, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 21, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 1, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 6, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 30, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 27, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 27, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 12, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 15, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 24, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 24, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 11, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 11, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 24, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 17, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 7, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 27, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 17, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance