USPTO serial 76561382
CROSS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIRIE, VERNA BETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CROSS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
City of Industry, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott A. McCollister
SCOTT A MCCOLLISTER FAY, SHARPE, FAGAN, MINNICH & MCKEE1100 SUPERIOR AVE SEVENTH FLCLEVELAND, OH 44114-2518UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | golf clubs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 31, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |